![]() I believe there were other serial groups that could be found in all three iterations, as well. I know it doesn’t fit neatly into what you and many other collectors WANT for serial number sequences, but the data is clear. In fact, of the 50 examples in my database, there was NO stronger correlation with any iteration or serial numbers than with the 2915-1 and 16,648,xxx serials. In fact, the serials were often very close in number. Each can be verified from Sothebys, Christies, owners. I provided examples of at least 4, possibly 5 2915-1 watches with 16,648,xxx serials. ![]() It is very clear that the iterations were not made one, then the next, then the or with movements with numbers that followed a strict sequence. I see your table continues to deny what is painfully obvious about 2915 serial numbers: 16,648xxx serials are found in every iteration, -1, -2, -3. The information was from owners and from past auctions that may still be viewed online. I have shared information from a database I compiled with maybe 50 examples of 2915 watches.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |